Today Slate.com has a pro-Bill Simmons piece "Bill Simmons: Bard of the Red Sox." - Bill Simmons writes for ESPN.com and formerly worked here in Boston for the Boston Herald (one of my former employers, he also went to BU's grad j-program, as did I, but I don't know him). But after finding traditional print sports world frustrating he set off on his own to start the Website - Boston Sports Guy - the popularity of the site drew ESPN's atttention. I sometimes have problems with what he writes - particulary that awful WNBA piece, which I wrote about in another post. But, on the other hand, I can find his off-the-cuff, rambling sports writing refreshing even if I don't agree with it - like blogging, except it's a column for a big media outlet. Speaking of blogging, there was some online debate on Simmons' opinion of bloggers after an interview he did with Chuck Klosterman. Some sports bloggers have weighed in on this like Eric at OffWingOpinion. As for what some professional sports journalists think about Simmons - you can read the chatter on SportsJournalists.com
In an interview with David Scott (another Bostonian) who runs Scott's Shot Blog, Simmons said in defense of his writing style/approach:
"Why can't there be different ways to write/talk about sports? Isn't the ultimate goal to be entertaining and make the games more fun to follow? Who cares how you do it?”
My hope that is that "different ways" also includes more solid and smart coverage of the women athletes out there.